Zdruzenje zdravnikov druzinske medicine Slovenije
 
Nazaj

COMPLAINT SYSTEM IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTRE
(Prepared by: Janko Kersnik,
Department of family medicine, University Ljubljana)

 

Background: Traditionally the patients were able to complain personally or in written over a provider directly to the practice manager but only a few did it so. Many of the complaints got forgotten because of the "insignificant" content. Early detection of problems can improve doctor patient communication and diminish serious complaints or even suits. Patients should be empowered to communicate their experiences through complaint procedure.

Aim: The objective of the project is to enable patients to communicate their experiences and use of them for quality improvement efforts in an easy and acceptable manner.

Methods: Boxes for collecting complaints were installed at all major patient areas in health centres in the district Gorenjsko which cover primary care for 200.000 patients. Patients were instructed to deliver their complaints and comments signed or unsigned. Short instructions for patients are available on the posters and on the leaflets which contain form for delivering comments. Responsible persons were appointed in each of 6 health centres. If the patient delivers signed comment he receives reply from the person responsible for handling complaints. Data are gathered from complaint boxes on a monthly basis. Complaints are sorted by the type of the problem. Technical problems are addressed by a group of experts, other are used for planing CME and other activities to improve doctor patient communication.

Results: In a half year period one complaint over the technical aspect of care arrived and was settled by internal audit procedure. One complaint was about the organisation of out of hours services because the doctor was not in the office when she should be. There were also five complaints over the provision of appointments for specialist services and unavailability of the doctor during the afternoon hours. In three health centres we did not receive any complaint.

Conclusions: Patients express positive attitude towards the possibility to provide their opinions in such an easy manner. The number of comments received from the patients is still very low due to cultural differences in ECC, but the first steps have been made. Further empowering of patients to communicate their views is needed. The staff has to be reassured the complaint system is not aimed to victimise them but to improve their performance especially in interpersonal aspects of care.